Find the moment. Check the finding.
What did you hear?
Search claims, explanations, guests and episode titles. Speaker names appear when attribution has been confirmed.
75 checks
Page 4 of 4DistortedThomas Campbell (matched by voice)
Thomas Campbell does describe, in this same episode, personally prompting Google's Gemini and an Alexa device to attempt remote viewing style exercises. But that's one person's informal experiment with consumer AI products, not something Google or Amazon built or trained their models to do. It's also worth knowing remote viewing itself has never been shown to work in controlled scientific testing, so calling this an established capability overstates what's actually going on.
DistortedChris Williamson (matched by voice)
The agreement exists and it is not about slowing down. Sixteen companies including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Microsoft and Amazon signed the Frontier AI Safety Commitments at the Seoul summit in May 2024. What they committed to was publishing safety frameworks, naming the risks they consider intolerable, and not shipping a model where those risks cannot be mitigated. Nobody agreed to move slower overall.
DistortedSpeaker not confirmed
NIH/NIAID funded EcoHealth Alliance, which subgranted to WIV for bat coronavirus research. The NIH confirmed in Oct 2021 that WIV did conduct limited experiments that could be characterized as gain-of-function under the broadest definitions. However, intelligence agencies have not reached consensus on COVID's origin, and the specific research funded has not been linked to SARS-CoV-2. Conflating NIH funding with deliberate creation of the pandemic significantly overstates what is actually known.
DistortedSpeaker not confirmed
There are documented cases of researchers facing pressure after publishing findings unfavorable to industry (e.g., Dr. Andrew Wakefield's fraud is on the other end; Dr. Marcia Angell's documented conflicts-of-interest concerns). Publication bias in favor of industry-funded positive results is a real, peer-reviewed phenomenon. However, claiming 'systematic suppression' implies an organized conspiracy rather than the more complex structural dynamics of research funding, peer review, and career incentives that genuinely do shape scientific output.
FalseSpeaker not confirmed
This is a pseudoscientific term with no basis in physical chemistry or quantum mechanics.
DistortedSpeaker not confirmed
The aether hypothesis was disproven by the Michelson-Morley experiment and rendered unnecessary by relativity.
FalseSpeaker not confirmed
There's no credible scientific evidence that the Flower of Life symbol encodes hidden physics. Howard's own explanation of it, built around terms like 'wave conjugations,' uses real sounding scientific language incorrectly, and outlets that reviewed his claims found the underlying terminology and math don't hold up. The Flower of Life is a sacred geometry symbol with cultural and decorative history, not a repository of undiscovered physical laws.
FalseSpeaker not confirmed
The CDC's actual response to ICAN's lawsuit listed 20 peer reviewed studies, including 13 specifically on thimerosal, not zero. Fact checkers who reviewed the court filing found ICAN's 'no studies' framing was inaccurate, since thimerosal research existed and at least one study directly covered the specific childhood vaccines ICAN had asked about. Health authorities like the CDC and WHO have decades of published thimerosal safety research on record.
DistortedSpeaker not confirmed
There is at least one, and it was CDC work. DeStefano and colleagues published a study in the Journal of Pediatrics in 2013 comparing 256 children with autism against 752 controls, looking at how much immune stimulation each had received from vaccines between three months and two years old. They found no link, either to total antigens by age two or to the most received in a single day.
FalseSpeaker not confirmed
Peer-reviewed literature consistently shows that vaccines prevent severe disease without increasing the overall burden of chronic illness. Studies making contrary claims often suffer from selection bias or 'healthy user' bias in their methodology.
FalseSpeaker not confirmed
The Flower of Life is a decorative pattern of overlapping circles that shows up in ancient carvings and later in sacred geometry writing. It is a design motif, not mathematics. Modern AI runs on linear algebra, calculus and probability, and nothing in that lineage traces back to this symbol.
DistortedSpeaker not confirmed
AI is used in logistics and trading, but 'significant control' is an overstatement. Human agents and traditional algorithms still manage the vast majority of physical resource distribution.
One-sidedSpeaker not confirmed
This tracks real concern among serious researchers. UC Berkeley deepfake expert Hany Farid has warned publicly that we're losing a shared reality because people increasingly can't tell real footage from fake, to the point that authentic evidence of anything remarkable becomes easy to dismiss as fabricated. It's a defensible worry held by credentialed experts, but treating it as a certainty about the future rather than one likely risk among several is one sided.
One-sidedSpeaker not confirmed
This tracks a real position in neuroscience associated with Antonio Damasio, who argues that feelings and consciousness grow out of a living body's biological drive to maintain homeostasis, something a machine doesn't have. It's a credible, well established view, not a fringe one, but it isn't the consensus either: plenty of researchers in philosophy of mind think consciousness could in principle arise in non biological systems. Stating it as a near certainty skips over that ongoing disagreement.
DistortedSpeaker not confirmed
JWST has found massive galaxies earlier than expected, challenging models of GALAXY FORMATION, but most astrophysicists still maintain the ~13.8 billion year age based on Cosmic Microwave Background data.
Flagged claims only. “Unverified” means unresolved, not false. Topic labels help browsing and are not evidence.