Joe Rogan Experience #2549 - Jared Diamond · Aired Sep 3, 2026
Claim summary · not a verbatim quotation
The Foray language of Papua New Guinea has two separate verbs for 'to be', one for inanimate objects and one for animals.
The finding
What the evidence shows
There is no language actually called Foray. The name almost certainly points to Fore, pronounced FOR-ay, the very first New Guinea language Jared Diamond learned by his own account. Papua New Guinea highland languages do have real documented systems where the verb for existence or being changes based on the noun class of the subject, including animacy, for example Enga and Kuman, but these systems usually involve several verb categories sorted by shape, posture and state rather than a simple two way animate versus inanimate split, and none of the sources checked confirm this specific two verb animals versus objects setup for Fore or its close relative Foi. So the general idea has real linguistic roots but the specific claim as stated does not match documented grammars.
Read the supporting source · openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au ↗Quick answer & review status
Quick answer
Is it true that the Foray language of Papua New Guinea has two separate verbs for 'to be', one for inanimate objects and one for animals?
Partly. The claim stretches what the evidence shows. There is no language actually called Foray. The name almost certainly points to Fore, pronounced FOR-ay, the very first New Guinea language Jared Diamond learned by his own account. Jared Diamond said it (matched by voice) on Joe Rogan Experience #2549 - Jared Diamond, aired Sep 3, 2026, at 58:17. The supporting source is openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au, linked below.
The context belongs here.
No separately verified on-air correction is recorded for this check. That is not a claim that nobody corrected it.
- Attribution
- Not independently confirmed in this record
- Editorial context review
- Not recorded; generated finding
- Coverage
- One selected claim from the episode
Revisions to this check
No dated revision is recorded here. Older checks may predate this log.
Challenge this finding or add context →Keep the evidence coming.
Follow new checks in your RSS reader, or catch up with the weekly briefing on the site.
Email signup is currently unavailable.
Prefer to catch up here? Read the weekly briefing.