A musician attacked a paparazzi photographer after arriving in New Zealand for a concert in 2008.

We revised this check on Oct 31, 2026. See what changed and why ↓

The finding

What the evidence shows

Contemporaneous reporting identifies Bjork, not Pete Doherty, and reports a photographer's accusation after her Auckland arrival. Police said no one had complained of assault and no witnesses had approached them. The source establishes an accusation, not that the attack occurred, while the published claim states the attack as fact.

Read the supporting source · www.theguardian.com ↗

Quick answer & review status

Quick answer

Is it true that a musician attacked a paparazzi photographer after arriving in New Zealand for a concert in 2008?

Partly. The claim stretches what the evidence shows. Contemporaneous reporting identifies Bjork, not Pete Doherty, and reports a photographer's accusation after her Auckland arrival. Police said no one had complained of assault and no witnesses had approached them. Joe Rogan said it (matched by voice) on Joe Rogan Experience #2573 - Legion of Skanks, aired Oct 30, 2026, at 1:28:41. The supporting source is theguardian.com, linked below.

The context belongs here.

No separately verified on-air correction is recorded for this check. That is not a claim that nobody corrected it.

Attribution: Not independently confirmed in this record
Editorial context review: Not recorded; generated finding
Coverage: One selected claim from the episode

Revisions to this check

Oct 31, 2026

Previously: A musician attacked a paparazzi photographer after arriving in New Zealand for a concert in 2008. [Accurate]: In 2008, the musician Pete Doherty was involved in a physical altercation with a photographer upon his arrival at an airport in New Zealand. This event was widely reported in international news media at the time.

Now: A musician attacked a paparazzi photographer after arriving in New Zealand for a concert in 2008. [Distorted]: Contemporaneous reporting identifies Bjork, not Pete Doherty, and reports a photographer's accusation after her Auckland arrival. Police said no one had complained of assault and no witnesses had approached them. The source establishes an accusation, not that the attack occurred, while the published claim states the attack as fact.

Corrected the mistaken person attribution and changed an unsubstantiated allegation stated as fact to distorted.

Evidence for the revision ↗

Challenge this finding or add context →

Stay curious. Stay up to date.

Keep the evidence coming.

Follow new checks in your RSS reader, or catch up with the weekly briefing on the site.

Follow the RSS feed

Email signup is currently unavailable.

Prefer to catch up here? Read the weekly briefing.

RSS feed